<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		
		<title>firstclimate: Latest News</title>
		<link>http://www.firstclimate.com/</link>
		<description>Latest News</description>
		<language>en</language>
		
		<generator>TYPO3 - get.content.right</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		
		
		
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:00:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		
		
		<item>
			<title>First Climate LLC is Founding Reporter of The Climate Registry</title>
			<link>http://www.firstclimate.com/en/press-events/news-details/article/2008/05/20/30/first-climate-llc-is-founding-reporter-of-the-climate-registry.html</link>
			<description>Industry Leader Takes Action on Climate Change </description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[First Climate LLC has become a Founding Reporter of The Climate Registry by being among the first to join the organization.  The Climate Registry is a non-profit organization established to measure and publicly report greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) in a common, accurate and transparent manner consistent across industry sectors and borders.  Thirty-nine U.S. states, eight Canadian provinces, six Mexican states, three Native American tribes, and the District of Columbia are the founders of the organization. 

“First Climate has demonstrated exemplary environmental leadership by courageously stepping forward to support The Climate Registry in its preliminary stages.  We are deeply grateful for their integral support in helping to address the challenge of climate change,” said Gina McCarthy, Chair of The Climate Registry.

A forerunner in the carbon market, First Climate has demonstrated environmental stewardship on several fronts by voluntarily committing to measure, independently verify, and publicly report their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions on an annual basis utilizing The Climate Registry General Reporting Protocol.  The protocol is based on the internationally recognized GHG measurement standards of the World Resources Institute and World Business Council on Sustainability.  

As a vertically integrated player covering the entire dynamic carbon market value chain, First Climate is in a leading position to help clients with the climate change portion of their Sustainability programs. First Climate combines the competence and expertise in methodology and project development from Factor AG with the financial savviness in carbon credit commercialization and the climate neutral expertise of 3C.

First Climate identifies emission reduction opportunities worldwide and facilitates the development, financing and implementation of climate protection projects (CDM, JI and VER) from its headquarters in Bad Vilbel/Frankfurt, Germany and Zurich, Switzerland, and offices and cooperations around the globe. They offer custom trading and risk management solutions for companies within the EU ETS, and support the structuring and development of carbon funds. Furthermore, First Climate is a first-class provider of climate neutral services, such as climate neutral strategy development, corporate carbon footprint assessment and retirement of high quality emission reduction credits from a global VER project portfolio. 

First Climate LLC is the U.S. subsidiary of the globally expanding First Climate Group. The Washington, D.C.-based subsidiary recently announced it will open an office in the San Francisco Bay Area of California.

Bjorn Fischer, Managing Director of First Climate LLC, in Washington, D.C. said, “The importance of the proper development of the US Market can not be understated and companies joining and aligning with The Climate Registry helps accomplish this. Sascha Lafeld, Executive Board Member at First Climate welcomes the Climate Registry’s effort: “This initiative is a major step towards building a solid GHG accounting infrastructure, and we are proud to lend our support from the initiation of this project. A high-quality carbon marketplace needs such initiatives to increase standardization and transparency, and in the end, credibility. 

Entities that join before May, 2008 are eligible to receive Founding Reporter status. 

About The Climate Registry
Incorporated in March 2007 in Washington, DC, The Climate Registry sets consistent and transparent standards for the measurement, verification, and public reporting of greenhouse gas emissions throughout North America in a single unified registry. The Registry is a non-profit organization that supports both voluntary and mandatory reporting programs, provides meaningful information to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and embodies the highest levels of environmental integrity. For more information please visit, www.theclimateregistry.org.

<strong>Contact</strong>: Justin Bilow  (213) 891-1444 ext. 127  

» Download press release as<link fileadmin/downloads/press/pr/2008/20080520_FC_PR_Climate_Registry_dh.pdf external-link-new-window First Climate Press Release> PDF</link>]]></content:encoded>
			<category>Press Release</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 09:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>First Climate in Carbon Finance: First Climate plans US carbon fund</title>
			<link>http://www.firstclimate.com/en/press-events/news-details/article/2008/05/14/30/first-climate-in-carbon-finance-first-climate-plans-us-carbon-fund.html</link>
			<description>Carbon asset manager First Climate is planning a carbon credit fund for the US market that will invest in a mix of voluntary emission reductions (VERs) produced domestically and overseas, and...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[“We have been approached by some interested parties in the US,” said Markus Hüwener, CEO of First Climate, formed recently through the merger of Germany’s 3C and Switzerland’s Factor Consulting + Management.
Hüwener said the fund would be marketed to two kinds of buyers: companies that are likely to face obligations in future regional and federal US cap-and-trade schemes, and offset service providers.
First Climate will begin raising capital into the fund “very soon”. Hüwener said those parties that had already shown interest would contribute around $20-25 million, but the fund could potentially reach $100 million. 
The structure of the as yet unnamed fund is close to being finalised and is likely to aim at buying mainly domestic offsets but with some VERs from overseas projects and CERs. This combination is essential to meet the needs of both kinds of buyers and to minimise the risk that some kinds of credits may be ineligible for future cap-and-trade schemes.
Given the lack of clarity on which kinds of projects will be eligible under future mandatory schemes, the VERs will need to be from the highest quality projects, Hüwener said, namely those with high additionality, social and sustainability criteria. In terms of standards, the VERs will need to meet the Voluntary Carbon Standard, or higher, he said.
First Climate is likely to source at least some of the credits internally. The firm has a team developing projects that produce CERs and VERs and will work with partners to develop VER projects in the US.]]></content:encoded>
			<category>Press Clipping</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 13:40:00 +0200</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>First Climate in Point Carbon: Kyoto carbon credit buyers need post-2012 agreement for price guidance</title>
			<link>http://www.firstclimate.com/en/press-events/news-details/article/2008/05/02/30/first-climate-in-point-carbon-kyoto-carbon-credit-buyers-need-post-2012-agreement-for-price-guidanc.html</link>
			<description>Companies and funds looking to buy carbon credits generated by Kyoto protocol emissions reduction projects need a post-2012 agreement on climate-changing gases to ensure sufficient long-term price...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA["The post-2012 market is currently insufficiently liquid and transparent for consistent price discovery," said Jill Barker, global marketing executive at Ecosecurities, a Dublin-based developer and supplier of emissions reduction projects.
The Kyoto protocol obliges rich countries to reduce emissions of six greenhouse gases by some 5 per cent below the 1990 level during the period 2008-2012, and countries can partly meet those commitments by buying UN-backed offset credits. The most active carbon credit scheme is the Kyoto protocol's clean development mechanism (CDM). The CDM allows companies and governments in rich nations with caps on emissions to trade carbon credits for compliance purposes, in return for their investments in emissions-reduction projects in developing countries.
Point Carbon analysts pegged last year’s CDM market value at nearly $20 billion, and some analysts say global carbon trading has the potential to reach some $100 billion by 2020.
The bulk of global demand for CDM carbon credits, called certified emissions reductions, comes from companies participating in the European emissions trading scheme – the 27-nation bloc’s main policy tool to help member states meet their international and regional targets. But uncertainty prevails over both demand for credits and how a future UN offsetting scheme might be shaped after 2012.
“We can have an idea about supply if we make some hypotheses, but we don’t know much about demand (post-2012),” Emmanuel Fages, analyst a financial services firm Societe Generale, told Point Carbon.
International negotiators have agreed to conclude talks on finding a potential successor to the Kyoto protocol by the end of 2009, and a revamp of the CDM is on the agenda for the talks. However, negotiations are at an early stage, with large emitting countries like the US, Russia, China and India wary about taking on post-2012 binding emissions reduction targets.The EU bloc is currently debating new rules for its emissions trading scheme from 2013, which could affect future demand for CDM credits – depending on whether there is a post-2012 international agreement. The market would have much more clarity about demand if the US committed to binding emissions reductions targets in a post-2012 agreement, said Fages.
The EU aims to have the post-2012 design of its carbon trading scheme enshrined in law by early 2009, although some observers remain sceptical it will manage to meet that deadline.
<strong>Price range</strong>
The current price range for post-2012 carbon credits generated by CDM projects is about €5.50-€7.50 ($8.51-$11.60) per tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent, according to Urs Brodmann, chief risk officer and member of the executive board of First Climate, a carbon asset management company. “The price range really depends on the quality of the project,” he said. Brodmann pointed out that a higher premium would be paid for projects offering higher delivery certainty or environmental and social side benefits. “Generally, the volume of trades involving a firm offtake obligation for the buyer is today quite small compared to the volume of trades in Kyoto vintages,” he said.
Still, Brodmann said that the future development of the post-2012 CER price range largely hinges on the outcome of international climate negotiations in December 2009.
“December 2009 will be the earliest date when an agreement can be adopted, and then any agreement will need to be ratified, which could still take some years,” Brodmann said. “We don’t expect the (post-2012 CER) price range to change much in the near term,” he said, adding that “we see ourselves as an important driver of demand so the price range will be supported.”
First Climate, as investment adviser, together with Conning Asset Management Ltd, manage a €125 million, post-2012 carbon credit fund, which is supported by the European Investment Bank (EIB) and four European bank partners. The fund will purchase and trade Kyoto protocol carbon credits from 2013 to 2022.
“The most important thing for project developers to remember when deciding how to handle their post-2012 volumes is that they need a reliable counterparty, which is likely to be around post-2012,” said Ecosecurities' Barker. “Ecosecurities is already signing contracts which last up to 2017, as we have every intention of being a large player in the market for years to come. However, not all counterparties may be able to sustain their business model this long,” she added.
]]></content:encoded>
			<category>Press Clipping</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 11:51:00 +0200</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>First Climate in Bloomberg: European Investment Bank Boosts Size of Post-2012 Emission Fund</title>
			<link>http://www.firstclimate.com/en/press-events/news-details/article/2008/04/28/30/first-climate-in-bloomberg-european-investment-bank-boosts-size-of-post-2012-emission-fund.html</link>
			<description>The European Investment Bank, the lending arm of the European Union, boosted the size of a fund to curb emissions after 2012 by 25 percent to 125 million euros ($195 million).</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The bank, known as the EIB, will invest 50 million euros, with 25 million euros each coming from Caisse des Depots and KfW Bankengruppe, 15 million euros from the Nordic Investment Bank and 10 million euros from Instituto de Crédito Oficial, EIB and partners said today in an e-mailed statement.<br /><br />The Post 2012 Carbon Credit Fund will invest in developing renewable energy, carbon dioxide capture and energy efficiency projects, generating tradable emission credits starting 2013, potentially the first year of a new international climate- protection agreement. The 1997 Kyoto Protocol has a compliance period of the five years through 2012.<br /><br />&quot;Uncertainty over the form of any post Kyoto carbon credit trading regime is currently making it difficult for environmentally worthwhile projects to monetize fully the economic benefits of the emission reductions they may make after 2012,'' the statement said.<br /><br />The fund will be managed by a consortium of Conning Asset Management (Europe) Ltd., a unit of Swiss Reinsurance, and First Climate, an emissions project developer and fund manager based in Bad Vilbel, Germany.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
			<category>Press Clipping</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:01:00 +0200</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>First Climate in Point Carbon: EIB ups size of post-2012 carbon credit fund</title>
			<link>http://www.firstclimate.com/en/press-events/news-details/article/2008/04/28/30/first-climate-in-point-carbon-eib-ups-size-of-post-2012-carbon-credit-fund.html</link>
			<description>The European Investment Bank (EIB) has raised the size of a post-2012 carbon credit fund by 25 per cent to €125 million ($195 million) and today named the managers of the fund.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ EIB will invest €50 million, with €25 million each coming from Caisse des Depots and KfW Bankengruppe, €15 million from the Nordic Investment Bank and €10 million from Instituto de Credito Oficial, EIB and its partners said in a statement.<br /><br /> The fund will be managed by a consortium of Conning Asset Management Ltd and First Climate. Launched last year with an initial pledge of €100 million, the fund will purchase and trade carbon credits generated by greenhouse gas emissions reduction projects after the Kyoto protocol’s first commitment period ends in 2012. The fund will support a variety of emissions reduction projects, such as renewable energy, energy efficiency, forestry and methane capture from 2013 to 2022. “By assuming the inherent regulatory risk, the fund will give a clear signal to the market of the EIB and its partners’ confidence in the development of a post Kyoto regime while directly supporting environmental projects,” the statement said.<br /><br />The Kyoto protocol obliges rich nations with a cap on six greenhouse gas emissions to reduce emissions on average by some 5 per cent below the 1990 level in the period 2008-2012. Due to the uncertainty of a future international climate agreement, the fund will purchase post 2012 carbon credits of UN-endorsed emissions reduction projects, namely clean development mechanism (CDM) and joint implementation (JI).<br /><br />“As 2012 is approaching, the uncertainty in long-term prices for carbon is increasingly affecting project developers,” said Urs Brodmann, executive board member of the fund’s investment adviser, First Climate. “The Post 2012 Carbon Credit Fund will make additional CDM and JI projects viable by offering guaranteed carbon off-take at attractive prices,” he said in the statement. The 27-member EU bloc is the biggest buyer of Kyoto protocol carbon credits. “As the EU’s financing arm, our role is to support these efforts by promoting environmental lending and developing carbon credits,” said Philippe Maystadt, president of EIB.]]></content:encoded>
			<category>Press Clipping</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:48:00 +0200</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>First Climate in Reuters: EIB, banks launch $200 million post-2012 carbon fund</title>
			<link>http://www.firstclimate.com/en/press-events/news-details/article/2008/04/28/30/first-climate-in-reuters-eib-banks-launch-200-million-post-2012-carbon-fund.html</link>
			<description>The European Investment Bank, along with four European banks, have launched a 125 million euro ($195.8 million) carbon fund which will invest exclusively in carbon emission credits to be issued after...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Initiator and principal investor the EIB said it is partnering with France's Caisse des Depots, Spain's Instituto de Credito Oficial, Germany's KfW Bankengruppe, and Finland's Nordic Investment Bank to purchase so-called post-Kyoto Protocol carbon credits from clean energy projects in developing countries. 
"The EU is at the forefront of international efforts to combat climate change," said EIB President Philippe Maystadt in a statement. 
"This Fund, combined with other EIB carbon and climate change initiatives, positions the bank as a significant contributor to global climate change efforts." 
The EIB is committing the first 50 million euros, with the participants funding the remaining 75 million euros between them. 
The United Nations' Kyoto Protocol agreement on global warming, which sets binding targets on greenhouse gas emissions, is set to expire in 2012 and governments are scrambling to agree on a new pact by the end of 2009. 
Absence of a successor agreement would cast uncertainty onto the booming $60 billion international carbon market. 
"By assuming the inherent regulatory risk, the fund will give a clear signal to the market of the EIB and its partners' confidence in the development of a post Kyoto regime while directly supporting environmental projects," the group said in a statement. 
The Post 2012 Carbon Credit Fund, the first of its kind, will contract credits from projects under Kyoto's Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and Joint Implementation (JI) schemes for delivery as far away as 2022. 
The CDM and JI schemes allow companies and governments in rich nations to invest in and buy offet credits from clean energy projects in developing countries. 
The fund's participants have appointed Conning Asset Management and newly-formed First Climate as fund managers. 
In March 2007, the EIB partnered with the World Bank to launch a similar European Carbon fund, worth some 50 million euro ($78.3 million). ]]></content:encoded>
			<category>Press Clipping</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:51:00 +0200</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>First Climate among Top Providers in ENDS Report</title>
			<link>http://www.firstclimate.com/en/press-events/news-details/article/2008/04/23/30/first-climate-among-top-providers-in-ends-report.html</link>
			<description>First Climate (previously 3C and Factor) receives praise for its excellent offset pipeline and value-added services.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[First Climate received a top-tier rating for its carbon offset services from The ENDS Guide to Carbon Offsets 2008, the most recent guide to the global voluntary carbon market. The ENDS Report highlights First Climate’s excellent portfolio of high quality offsets as the cornerstone of First Climate’s business model complimented by its value-added services of carbon investment advice, carbon trading and CDM project management.<br /><br />With more than ten years of carbon market experience, First Climate can look back on developing and commercializing more than 160 projects across all continents. With offices in Germany, France, England, Switzerland, the United States, Chile and China, First Climate has extensive expertise in originating and procuring CDM/JI and VER projects. The company is involved in the entire carbon credit value chain: from the development of emission reduction projects to the issuance and commercialization of certificates. All compensation projects offered by First Climate fulfill the highest quality standards. As a proponent of quality projects with additional social and environmental benefits, First Climate is the main sponsor of the Gold Standard version 2.<br />

<hr> <strong>First Climate</strong> combines the competence and expertise in project and methodology development from Factor AG and the financial savviness in carbon credit commercialization and the climate neutral expertise of 3C. As a vertically integrated player covering the entire carbon credit value chain, First Climate is among the leading companies in the dynamic carbon markets.  First Climate facilitates the development, financing and implementation of CDM, JI and VER projects. First Climate offers custom trading and risk management solutions for companies within the EU ETS, and supports the structuring and development of carbon funds. First Climate is among the world's leading companies for climate neutral services and offers high quality emission reduction credits from a global portfolio. 

<strong>Contact</strong><br /> First Climate <br /> Fritz Wilhelm <br /> Head Corporate Communications<br /> Tel.: +49 (0)6101 - 5 56 58 - 34 <br /> Fax +49 (0)6101 - 5 56 58 - 77 <br /> E-Mail:<link fritz.wilhelm@firstclimate.com _blank>fritz.wilhelm@firstclimate.com</link><br /> <link http://www.firstclimate.com>www.firstclimate.com</link>  

» Download press release as<link fileadmin/downloads/press/pr/2008/20080423_FC_PR_ENDS_report.pdf external-link-new-window First First Climate Press Release> PDF</link>]]></content:encoded>
			<category>Press Release</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>First Climate in Carbon Finance: 3C and Factor name merged company</title>
			<link>http://www.firstclimate.com/en/press-events/news-details/article/2008/04/16/30/first-climate-in-carbon-finance-3c-and-factor-name-merged-company.html</link>
			<description>European carbon companies 3C and Factor Consulting + Management have announced a new name for their post-merger business – First Climate.

</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Factor, a project and methodology developer, and 3C, which has expertise in carbon asset management and climate neutral services, first announced plans to join forces in October (see <link http://www.carbon-financeonline.com/index.cfm?section=inbrief&action=view&id=10825 external-link-new-window>3C merges with Factor</link>).

First Climate said it will build on its founders' reputations and “intends to become the first name in project financing”. It noted that its carbon investment advisory team is expected to announce a major deal within the next few weeks.

3C co-founder Markus Hüwener takes the role of chief executive at the new company. Urs Brodmann and Thomas Stettner, co-founders of Factor, become chief risk officer and chief operating officer, respectively. 

The business has 80 employees, most of which will be based at Bad Vilbel near Frankfurt, Germany, and in Zurich, Switzerland, with other offices in China, Chile and the US.

link to original <link http://www.carbon-financeonline.com/index.cfm?section=europe&action=view&id=11182 external-link-new-window>article</link>]]></content:encoded>
			<category>Press Clipping</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>First Climate in Point Carbon: Factor Consulting and 3C merge</title>
			<link>http://www.firstclimate.com/en/press-events/news-details/article/2008/04/14/30/first-climate-in-point-carbon-factor-consulting-and-3c-merge.html</link>
			<description>Carbon finance consultancies Factor Consulting and 3C, which is also known as The Carbon Credit Company, today announced that they have merged to form one company under the name of First Climate.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The new company will combine Factor’s skills in writing emission reduction methodologies for UN projects with the carbon financing skills of 3C, the two companies said in a statement today.

The new company will originate emission reduction projects abroad, with the aim of sourcing UN-approved carbon credits or voluntary credits, as well as offering advice to companies with an emission reduction target under the EU ETS and support fund managers in structuring and developing carbon credit funds, the company said.

<i>London</i>]]></content:encoded>
			<category>Press Clipping</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>First Climate in Bloomberg: Carbon Permits Advance to 10-Month High as Gas Jumps to Record</title>
			<link>http://www.firstclimate.com/en/press-events/news-details/article/2008/04/14/30/first-climate-in-bloomberg-carbon-permits-advance-to-10-month-high-as-gas-jumps-to-record.html</link>
			<description>European Union emission permits rose to a 10-month high as U.K. natural gas prices reached a record, making the clean-burning fuel potentially less profitable for power utilities.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Carbon dioxide permits for December rose as much as 50 cents, or 2.1 percent, to 24.88 euros ($39.28) a metric ton in London on the European Climate Exchange, their highest since June 5. They were at 24.75 euros a ton at 10:57 a.m. local time.

Emission allowances have surged 39 percent in the past year as the European Commission, which regulates the EU trading program, cut 2008 allocations by 9.4 percent compared with 2007. Power utilities need less than half as many permits to burn gas as they do to produce the same amount of electricity using coal.

Prices may rise through 25 euros a ton by the end of this week if gas and crude oil prices advance further, said Carsten Schmitt, an emissions-market analyst at First Climate, a company recently formed by the merger of 3C and Factor AG, based in Bad Vilbel, Germany. ``The high prices for oil and gas provide a bullish sentiment for carbon prices,'' Schmitt said. First Climate is a
fund manager and emissions-credit developer.

U.K. gas for delivery in May rose 2.2 percent to a record 60.82 pence a therm, according to the ICE Futures exchange in London. That's equivalent to $12 a million British thermal units. A therm is 100,000 Btus.

Coal for delivery in northwest Europe declined. The fuel for delivery to Amsterdam, Rotterdam or Antwerp with settlement next year fell 45 cents, or 0.3 percent, to $130 a metric ton as of 9:28 a.m. in London, according to GFI Group Inc.

     Crude oil for May delivery traded at $109.77 a barrel, down 37 cents at 10:47 a.m. London time in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange. It reached a record $112.21 a barrel on April 9.]]></content:encoded>
			<category>Press Clipping</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:58:00 +0200</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>3C and Factor become First Climate</title>
			<link>http://www.firstclimate.com/en/press-events/news-details/article/2008/04/14/30/3c-and-factor-become-first-climate.html</link>
			<description>Combining existing expertise in various market areas, the new company expands its global presence as well as its lines of business. </description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br />3C - The Carbon Credit Company and Factor AG announced today that they have joined forces to provide integrated carbon asset management services, positioned to take the lead in continental Europe. <br /><br />
Under the name First Climate, the new company combines the competence and expertise in project and methodology development from Factor AG and the financial savviness in carbon credit commercialization and the climate neutral expertise of 3C. As a vertically integrated player covering the entire carbon credit value chain, First Climate is among the leading companies in the dynamic carbon markets. <br /><br />
“We have developed new business lines to stay ahead of the rapidly growing carbon market and at the same time compliment our existing business portfolio”, says CEO Markus Hüwener about First Climate’s future plans.<br /><br />
Already known as one of the prime climate neutral providers and carbon fund advisors, First Climate intends to become the first name in project financing. With extensive experience in structuring carbon focused financial investments, the company offers innovative investment solutions for owners of and investors in emission reduction projects by tapping both conventional as well as specific carbon financing sources. First Climate has a comprehensive track record in financial advisory and financial management and an outstanding reputation as an experienced full service carbon market service provider.<br /><br />
First Climate’s Carbon Investment Advisory Team is expected to announce a major deal within the next few weeks. <br /><br />
The Project Origination Department is one of the largest teams within First Climate, spanning across four continents being operational in more than 25 countries. The diverse cultural and professional background of First Climate’s currently 80 staff members is mirrored in the diversified and comprehensive portfolio of CDM and VER projects.<br /><br />
“Now it's time to show the market that First Climate is more than the sum of Factor and 3C. We are carbon market movers”, said Hüwener at the company’s inception event.<br /><br />
To find out more about the new company, please visit the new website at www.firstclimate.com.<br /><br />
<hr>
<strong>First Climate</strong> is a fully integrated Carbon Asset Management company covering the entire carbon credit value chain. As a buyer, intermediary and investment advisor, First Climate identifies emission reduction opportunities worldwide and facilitates the development, financing and implementation of CDM, JI and VER projects. First Climate offers custom trading and risk management solutions for companies regulated under the EU ETS and other emission trading compliance schemes. The Carbon Investment Advisory Team supports fund managers in the structuring and development of carbon funds, and with related investment decisions. Furthermore, First Climate is a first-class provider of climate neutral services, such as corporate climate neutral strategy development, corporate carbon footprint assessment, climate neutral marketing and IT-communications solutions, and the purchase and retirement of high quality emission reduction credits from a global VER project portfolio.

<strong>Contact
First Climate<br>Fritz Wilhelm<br>Head Corporate Communications</strong><br>Tel.: +49 (0)6101 - 5 56 58 - 34<br>Fax +49 (0)6101 - 5 56 58 - 77<br>E-Mail: <link fritz.wilhelm@firstclimate.com _blank>fritz.wilhelm@firstclimate.com</link><br>www.firstclimate.com

» Download press release as <link /fileadmin/downloads/press/pr/2008/20080414_FC_PR_First_Climate_Launch.pdf external-link-new-window "First Climate Press Release">PDF</link>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category>Press Release</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>3C in Business News Americas: Entrevista con 3C Group</title>
			<link>http://www.firstclimate.com/en/press-events/news-details/article/2008/03/31/30/3c-in-business-news-americas-entrevista-con-3c-group.html</link>
			<description>Arturo Brandt Rivas, María Ana González, Francisco Avendaño
gerentes de proyecto senior, 3C Group</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[La energía renovable experimenta un auge en Latinoamérica gracias a que los países están empeñados en diversificar su parque de generación y reducir así la dependencia de los caros combustibles fósiles, cuyo suministro es poco confiable. Con la intención de promocionar el futuro crecimiento de la energía renovable, los gobiernos de la región están alentando -y en algunos casos obligando- a las generadoras a poner en marcha nuevos proyectos, ya sea eólicos, hidroeléctricos a pequeña escala o geotérmicos.

Si bien, en general, los proyectos de energía renovable no reciben subsidios en Latinoamérica, las iniciativas pueden postular y registrarse como mecanismos de desarrollo limpio (MDL) y, por lo tanto, vender bonos de carbono en el mercado global. No sorprende que los desarrolladores se muestren ansiosos por registrar sus proyectos como MDL, puesto que los bonos de carbono pueden generar los ingresos adicionales necesarios para hacer que la iniciativa sea factible.

Aunque Latinoamérica sigue registrando proyectos como MDL a un gran ritmo, su participación en el mercado global ha disminuido en los últimos años debido a que Asia se ha apoderado del liderazgo mundial en cuanto a la producción de bonos de carbono. 

En la presente entrevista, BNamericas conversa con tres expertos en el mercado latinoamericano de los bonos de carbono para saber más sobre el futuro de la región en el mercado y el potencial de algunas fuentes de generación renovable, como las pequeñas centrales hidroeléctricas y los parques eólicos. Los expertos -Arturo Brandt Rivas (en la foto), María Ana González y Francisco Avendaño- se desempeñan como gerentes de proyecto senior en la compañía, con sede en Santiago de Chile, 3C Group, firma de gestión de activos de carbono.

BNamericas: He visto números que muestran que el porcentaje que Latinoamérica tiene del mercado de bonos de carbono ha caído en los últimos años en comparación con otras regiones del mundo como Asia. ¿Por qué sería eso?

Avendaño: Lo que sucede es que el mercado de carbono empezó antes en Latinoamérica. El 2001, 2002, Latinoamérica ya estructuraba proyectos y tenía autoridades que apoyaban a los proyectos. China y gran parte de Asia recién han despertado en los últimos años, a partir del 2005. Del 2005 a la fecha, progresivamente han tenido mayor y mayor número de proyectos hasta llegar al punto de pasar el market share de Latinoamérica. Antes Latinoamérica tenía más o menos 56% versus el 44% en el resto del mundo, y ahora tiene la tercera parte, o algo así. 

Brandt Rivas: Cuando yo hablo de los proyectos hablo de potencial de generación de los proyectos, o sea, todos los bonos de carbono que se puede generar. Hoy día China sola es 60%. India es un 12%. Latinoamérica completa es un 16%. De ese 16%, hay un 8% que es de Brasil. Entonces el mercado está muy concentrado si tú ves que hay dos actores que representan un 72% del mercado y si sumas Brasil tienes con tres actores un 80% del mercado de generación de bonos. 

BNamericas: ¿Y creen que va a crecer el papel de Latinoamérica en este mercado?

Avendaño: Sí. Latinoamérica, junto con China, está creciendo mucho. Y dentro de eso hay una creciente demanda de energía considerando que los precios del petróleo, e incluso del carbón, están en aumento. Cada vez más esa potencia adicional eléctrica va a venir de fuentes renovables y el componente de carbono va a ser un complemento. De esa manera va a ir creciendo. Si bien dudo mucho que Latinoamérica pueda recuperar la participación de mercado que tuvo al inicio, van a seguir apareciendo oportunidades en el tema energético. 

BNamericas: Países como Perú y Colombia no tienen los mismos problemas de suministro de electricidad como Chile. ¿Ven ustedes que hay menos interés en desarrollar proyectos renovables en países que no necesariamente necesitan energía que sea más cara?

Brandt Rivas: El tema del mercado de carbono sigue reglas generales. Cuando un inversionista extranjero va a evaluar la participación o compra de un proyecto, ve ciertos estándares generales. Por ejemplo, Chile tiene un buen estándar para invertir en general. En consecuencia, hay muchos proyectos en Chile. Y si tú te fijas en la mayoría de los proyectos en Latinoamérica, donde hay 635, un poco menos de la mitad de eso -251- está en Brasil, 179 están en México, 46 en Chile y el siguiente es Colombia, que tiene 23 proyectos. Va acompañado como instrumento de mercado a una lógica de inversionista. Puede que exista un proyecto muy bueno, interesante desde el punto de vista de generación en Cuba, pero por riesgo país un inversionista extranjero no va a estar dispuesto a invertir en Cuba ni en Venezuela. 

González: Esto es parte de lo que está pasando en Argentina hoy en día. Hay una crisis energética también muy importante allá, pero hay pocos proyectos de Mecanismo de Desarrollo Limpio (MDL) porque, dadas las condiciones actuales de la presión de tarifas, la inversión en sí es difícil. 

Pero sí es cierto que en Chile últimamente hay bastante más proyectos hidroeléctricos por el tema de la falta de generación eléctrica. 

Brandt Rivas: Sí. El mayor potencial que yo vislumbro en Chile en la generación de proyectos de MDL en energía renovable es minihidro. Chile, por una condición geográfica, tiene naturalmente mucha posibilidad de desarrollo hidroeléctrico. Y las minihidros son más baratas. Un megavatio es US$1,5mn más o menos. Entonces tiene naturalmente, y por un tema también asociado de ser un país atractivo para inversionistas extranjeros, mayores posibilidades de que existan sistemas de generación asociados con la hidroeléctrica. 

Avendaño: Y en Perú, la inversión en hidroelectricidad está muy amarrada con los bonos de carbono. Casi 100% de los proyectos consideran desde el inicio el tema de bonos de carbono en las concesiones del proyecto. Y a nivel de política del Estado, si bien no se empuja la hidroelectricidad porque se le pone prioridad al desarrollo del mercado del gas natural, se ve con buenos ojos el poder de diversificación energética.

BNamericas: ¿En cuáles proyectos energéticos están involucrados en este momento?

Avendaño: Te puedo mencionar la naturaleza de los proyectos sin especificar los nombres por condiciones de confidencialidad. Son proyectos que van desde mejora de eficiencia energética a través de cambio de combustible, industria manufacturera, y proyectos también que involucran la generación hidroeléctrica.

BNamericas: ¿Como minihidro? Es bastante grande eso en Brasil, ¿no es cierto?

Avendaño: Es cierto: Brasil, Centroamérica, Perú y Colombia tienen varias iniciativas. 

Esos son los tipos de proyectos que nosotros apoyamos con un cofinanciamiento. Lo que hace es generar un flujo adicional de ingresos, mejorando la tasa interna de retorno de los proyectos. Con el tema de bonos de carbono podemos alcanzar un cierre de financiamiento de los proyectos dada la alta liquidez de los fondos que nosotros administramos. Podemos ofrecer contratos, de los cuales los contratos forward o compra forward de reducción de emisiones pueden servir para cerrar el financiamiento de un proyecto. 

BNamericas: ¿Cuál porcentaje contribuyen los bonos, en términos de la tasa interna de retorno?

Brandt Rivas: En energía, yo estoy participando en algunos proyectos eólicos, proyectos de generación con biomasa y algunas minihidros y proyectos de más de 20MW. La tasa de un proyecto aumentó un 1,5% por la generación que llega a través de los bonos de carbono. Esto es un promedio, que puede subir un poco o puedo bajar. Para una presentación que tengo que hacer en Brasil, he estado hablando con algunos desarrolladores de proyectos, y es más o menos 1,5% del valor final de la tasa por concepto de venta de bonos de carbono. 

Avendaño: Esto es en cuanto a rentabilidad en sí. Pero si lo enfoca desde el punto de vista de financiamiento de proyectos, imagínate uno de 10MW que involucre una inversión del orden de US$10mn u US$11mn. Puedo obtener por bonos de carbono -dependiendo en cuál lugar está- aproximadamente 100.000 bonos de carbono, o CER, acá hasta el 2012. Ahora a un precio referencial de 10 euros o US$14, estamos hablando de US$1,4mn. Ahora, allí hay una figura de adelantos de parte de estos US$1,4mn que están sujetos a descuentos o a garantías emitidos por el titular del proyecto. Pero en general los créditos al carbono ayudan mucho a obtener un capital para poder completar estos US$10mn u US$11mn que se requieren para 10MW hidroeléctricos. Esto es un ejemplo. 

BNamericas: Y cuéntame de tus operaciones en proyectos eólicos. 

Brandt Rivas: En teoría, uno de los proyectos más atractivos desde el punto de vista del mercado de carbono son los proyectos eólicos. El número de proyectos en Latinoamérica en el mercado de carbono que representa energía renovable no convencional es de 33% de un total de 635 proyectos. Estamos hablando de eólico, biomasa, energía solar. Los proyectos de energía eólica en Latinoamérica son 27. Hidro tiene 129, geotermia tiene 4, en biomasa hay 117 y en biogás hay 55. 

En Brasil hay 7 proyectos eólicos y un potencial de 436MW. En México hay 10 proyectos eólicos con un potencial de 1.172MW. En Costa Rica hay un proyecto eólico de 20MW y en Colombia hay un proyecto de 20MW. En Argentina hay un proyecto de 11MW. En Chile hay un proyecto de 19MW. En Ecuador hay un proyecto de 2MW. 

En todo el mundo, existen 352 proyectos eólicos con un potencial de 14.000MW.

Avendaño: Chile, a diferencia de otros países de Latinoamérica, posee un marco legal más maduro para la energía renovable, lo cual ha hecho que esté liderando el tema de generar los primeros proyectos de este tipo. Un potencial bastante respetable existe en Colombia, en Perú, etcétera, pero el marco legal debe madurar para que los proyectos tengan mercado en el cual colocar la electricidad. Por ejemplo, hasta hace poco en Perú un proyecto que generaba electricidad eólica al no estar contemplado dentro de las categorías oficiales de generación, no podía inyectar electricidad a la red. Esto sí recientemente ha cambiado y lo que se está discutiendo ahora en el Congreso de Perú es redactar una ley que genere incentivos para que al menos un porcentaje dado de electricidad en el país sea de origen renovable.

BNamericas: Lo que no entiendo yo es que si soy inversionista y quiero apoyar un proyecto de MDL, ¿para qué construir un proyecto eólico si puedo construir una planta minihidro que es más barata?

Avendaño: Mucho depende de cuál es el motivo o enfoque de negocio. 

González: Y disponibilidad de recursos.

Avendaño: Si tienes la necesidad de generar megavatios para cierta región y tienes varias opciones -hidro, eólico o geotérmico- te vas a ir a lo que sea económicamente más viable y más seguro. En el caso de que sí haya varias opciones de energía renovable en competencia, es cierto por lo general tomar las opciones más seguras como son las de hidroelectricidad. Hay otras que están comenzando a aparecer como la eólica pero son sobre todo en zonas donde otros tipos de recursos naturales que te pueden generar energía son escasos, o en todo caso existe un incentivo de precios que te permitan comercializarla.

Brandt Rivas: Hay una ley que exige a partir del 2008 que un 5% de la energía nueva que se genera sea a partir de fuentes renovables no convencionales. En eso la generadora puede producirlo por sí misma o puede salir a comprar. Con eso se espera que estimule la generación de energía renovable no convencional. 

González: Pero no hay subsidio directo. 

Brandt Rivas: Respondiendo un poco a tu pregunta de por qué no hay más proyectos eólicos, eso refleja el mercado. Hoy en día, hay 129 proyectos hidroeléctricos y 27 eólicos. 

González: Incluso la capacidad instalada para ambos es muy diferente.

Brandt Rivas: La capacidad instalada de proyectos eólicos en Brasil, por ejemplo, es de 436MW, y proyectos hidráulicos son 3.000MW. En Chile hay un proyecto eólico con capacidad de 19MW y hay nueve proyectos hidráulicos que tienen potencial de 360MW. 

González: Y el potencial en Chile de energía eólica en todo el sur en la Patagonia es impresionante. Y aun así hay poco desarrollo todavía. 

BNamericas: Es porque está lejos de la red, ¿no es cierto?

González: Sí.

ACERCA DE LA COMPAÑIA
Con oficinas centrales en Alemania, 3C Group es uno de los principales compradores y vendedores globales de bonos en el mercado de carbono de MDL y voluntario. 3C ofrece servicios de compensación de carbono a clientes corporativos, realizando desde el desarrollo de proyectos de protección del clima hasta la emisión y comercialización de certificados.

Por Randy Woods ]]></content:encoded>
			<category>Press Clipping</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 12:26:00 +0200</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>3C in Reuters: Russia takes &quot;rejection&quot; stance on Kyoto projects</title>
			<link>http://www.firstclimate.com/en/press-events/news-details/article/2008/03/13/30/3c-in-reuters-russia-takes-rejection-stance-on-kyoto-projects.html</link>
			<description>Foreign firms seeking to make money in Russia under the Kyoto Protocol will not have an easy time getting approval from the Russian state, the official in charge of Kyoto implementation in Russia...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA["The most correct approach is forbidding everything, but allowing certain things to go forward. The worst approach is to approve everything, but say certain things are forbidden," said Deputy Economy Minister Vsevolod Gavrilov. "We are working according to a principle of rejection." Market participants were dismayed at the remarks. They said Russia's approach to Kyoto implementation was self-defeating and would make many turn their backs on the Russian market.

Gavrilov was speaking at the first official news conference after Russia in January opened the door for clean energy projects under the Kyoto Protocol to go forward.

The protocol is an international agreement to fight global warming that obliges many developed nations to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases in 2008-2012 by 5 percent compared to 1990 levels. Under the protocol's joint implementation (JI) mechanism, rich countries can invest in emissions-cutting projects in developing nations and count the cuts as their own. 

'NO FREEBIES'

Gavrilov said there were now 60 such projects under development in Russia, funded by tens of millions of dollars from foreign investors who have waited nearly two years for the green light from the state. None of the projects, however, have yet applied for approval. When they do, Gavrilov said the investors would need to prove they are not just out for easy profit. "Unfortunately not all the investors are taking this opportunity the right way, seeing it as a way to get a freebie without doing any work," he said. "We want to avoid these speculative projects." A key advantage of Kyoto is that it profitable for businessmen to clean up the environment, said Nikolay Mishustin of 3C Group, a German carbon market investor. "The whole Kyoto protocol idea is to give financial incentive," he said. Even with the restrictions Gavrilov expects JI projects to achieve cuts of 100-500 million tonnes of carbon dioxide by 2012, equaling 100-500 million emissions reduction units, known as ERUs, the units that are sold on the global carbon market. Out of some 15 independent firms that verify these units in Russia, five have been accredited by Gavrilov's ministry. "The low rate of accreditation is easily explained ... When these organizations set up an office in Moscow and fill it with adequate experts, they will get accredited too," he said. Forcing the verifiers to have a local office will allow the ministry "to fulfill our regulatory role," Gavrilov said. 

SLAMMING THE DOOR

The unpredictability of state influence has made it unlikely that either the environment or foreign investors will have much to gain from Kyoto in Russia, market participants said.

"The risk is that they can give approval and then they can take away. This is all at the whim of the government," said Nicholas Sakharov, associate director of Tricorona, a Swedish investor in Kyoto instruments. "From the point of view of a buyer, as a whole, this approach means we will not be interested in working in Russia." But Gavrilov was not concerned with producing more emissions reductions, or with selling the resulting units to Europe. "This is absolutely not our goal. We have no interest in creating the largest carbon emissions market. Our goal is to promote norms of ecological responsibility," he said. One of the finest examples of this kind of responsibility, and the only one Gavrilov would name, was Surgutneftegaz, an oil major run by Kremlin-friendly billionaire Vladimir Bogdanov. The fact that the company sells associated gas, a by-product of oil production, instead of emitting it into the atmosphere, made it a Kyoto success story in Russia, Gavrilov said. Market players, however, countered that Surgut was doing this years before the protocol existed.

"I can only hope that this is not the influence of lobbyists seeking to push some projects forward while slamming the door in the face of others," said another carbon market investor, asking not be named for fear of state reprisals against his firm.]]></content:encoded>
			<category>Press Clipping</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:37:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>3C in Carbon Finance: 3C plans Singapore-listed carbon fund</title>
			<link>http://fileadmin/downloads/press/pc/2008/PC_2008_03_Carbon_Finance.pdf</link>
			<description>German carbon asset manger 3C is in talks with the Singapore Stock Exchange and investment banks with a view to launching a listed carbon fund later this year.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA["The most correct approach is forbidding everything, but allowing certain things to go forward. The worst approach is to approve everything, but say certain things are forbidden," said Deputy Economy Minister Vsevolod Gavrilov. "We are working according to a principle of rejection." Market participants were dismayed at the remarks. They said Russia's approach to Kyoto implementation was self-defeating and would make many turn their backs on the Russian market.

Gavrilov was speaking at the first official news conference after Russia in January opened the door for clean energy projects under the Kyoto Protocol to go forward.

The protocol is an international agreement to fight global warming that obliges many developed nations to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases in 2008-2012 by 5 percent compared to 1990 levels. Under the protocol's joint implementation (JI) mechanism, rich countries can invest in emissions-cutting projects in developing nations and count the cuts as their own. 

'NO FREEBIES'

Gavrilov said there were now 60 such projects under development in Russia, funded by tens of millions of dollars from foreign investors who have waited nearly two years for the green light from the state. None of the projects, however, have yet applied for approval. When they do, Gavrilov said the investors would need to prove they are not just out for easy profit. "Unfortunately not all the investors are taking this opportunity the right way, seeing it as a way to get a freebie without doing any work," he said. "We want to avoid these speculative projects." A key advantage of Kyoto is that it profitable for businessmen to clean up the environment, said Nikolay Mishustin of 3C Group, a German carbon market investor. "The whole Kyoto protocol idea is to give financial incentive," he said. Even with the restrictions Gavrilov expects JI projects to achieve cuts of 100-500 million tonnes of carbon dioxide by 2012, equaling 100-500 million emissions reduction units, known as ERUs, the units that are sold on the global carbon market. Out of some 15 independent firms that verify these units in Russia, five have been accredited by Gavrilov's ministry. "The low rate of accreditation is easily explained ... When these organizations set up an office in Moscow and fill it with adequate experts, they will get accredited too," he said. Forcing the verifiers to have a local office will allow the ministry "to fulfill our regulatory role," Gavrilov said. 

SLAMMING THE DOOR

The unpredictability of state influence has made it unlikely that either the environment or foreign investors will have much to gain from Kyoto in Russia, market participants said.

"The risk is that they can give approval and then they can take away. This is all at the whim of the government," said Nicholas Sakharov, associate director of Tricorona, a Swedish investor in Kyoto instruments. "From the point of view of a buyer, as a whole, this approach means we will not be interested in working in Russia." But Gavrilov was not concerned with producing more emissions reductions, or with selling the resulting units to Europe. "This is absolutely not our goal. We have no interest in creating the largest carbon emissions market. Our goal is to promote norms of ecological responsibility," he said. One of the finest examples of this kind of responsibility, and the only one Gavrilov would name, was Surgutneftegaz, an oil major run by Kremlin-friendly billionaire Vladimir Bogdanov. The fact that the company sells associated gas, a by-product of oil production, instead of emitting it into the atmosphere, made it a Kyoto success story in Russia, Gavrilov said. Market players, however, countered that Surgut was doing this years before the protocol existed.

"I can only hope that this is not the influence of lobbyists seeking to push some projects forward while slamming the door in the face of others," said another carbon market investor, asking not be named for fear of state reprisals against his firm.]]></content:encoded>
			<category>Press Clipping</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 15:23:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>3C in Point Carbon's Trading Carbon: Emissions Adjustment</title>
			<link>http://fileadmin/downloads/press/pc/2008/PC_2008_03_Trading_Carbon.pdf</link>
			<description>It was never going to be easy for the European Commiccion to please everyone with its proposals for reforming the EU Emissions Trading Scheme.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA["The most correct approach is forbidding everything, but allowing certain things to go forward. The worst approach is to approve everything, but say certain things are forbidden," said Deputy Economy Minister Vsevolod Gavrilov. "We are working according to a principle of rejection." Market participants were dismayed at the remarks. They said Russia's approach to Kyoto implementation was self-defeating and would make many turn their backs on the Russian market.

Gavrilov was speaking at the first official news conference after Russia in January opened the door for clean energy projects under the Kyoto Protocol to go forward.

The protocol is an international agreement to fight global warming that obliges many developed nations to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases in 2008-2012 by 5 percent compared to 1990 levels. Under the protocol's joint implementation (JI) mechanism, rich countries can invest in emissions-cutting projects in developing nations and count the cuts as their own. 

'NO FREEBIES'

Gavrilov said there were now 60 such projects under development in Russia, funded by tens of millions of dollars from foreign investors who have waited nearly two years for the green light from the state. None of the projects, however, have yet applied for approval. When they do, Gavrilov said the investors would need to prove they are not just out for easy profit. "Unfortunately not all the investors are taking this opportunity the right way, seeing it as a way to get a freebie without doing any work," he said. "We want to avoid these speculative projects." A key advantage of Kyoto is that it profitable for businessmen to clean up the environment, said Nikolay Mishustin of 3C Group, a German carbon market investor. "The whole Kyoto protocol idea is to give financial incentive," he said. Even with the restrictions Gavrilov expects JI projects to achieve cuts of 100-500 million tonnes of carbon dioxide by 2012, equaling 100-500 million emissions reduction units, known as ERUs, the units that are sold on the global carbon market. Out of some 15 independent firms that verify these units in Russia, five have been accredited by Gavrilov's ministry. "The low rate of accreditation is easily explained ... When these organizations set up an office in Moscow and fill it with adequate experts, they will get accredited too," he said. Forcing the verifiers to have a local office will allow the ministry "to fulfill our regulatory role," Gavrilov said. 

SLAMMING THE DOOR

The unpredictability of state influence has made it unlikely that either the environment or foreign investors will have much to gain from Kyoto in Russia, market participants said.

"The risk is that they can give approval and then they can take away. This is all at the whim of the government," said Nicholas Sakharov, associate director of Tricorona, a Swedish investor in Kyoto instruments. "From the point of view of a buyer, as a whole, this approach means we will not be interested in working in Russia." But Gavrilov was not concerned with producing more emissions reductions, or with selling the resulting units to Europe. "This is absolutely not our goal. We have no interest in creating the largest carbon emissions market. Our goal is to promote norms of ecological responsibility," he said. One of the finest examples of this kind of responsibility, and the only one Gavrilov would name, was Surgutneftegaz, an oil major run by Kremlin-friendly billionaire Vladimir Bogdanov. The fact that the company sells associated gas, a by-product of oil production, instead of emitting it into the atmosphere, made it a Kyoto success story in Russia, Gavrilov said. Market players, however, countered that Surgut was doing this years before the protocol existed.

"I can only hope that this is not the influence of lobbyists seeking to push some projects forward while slamming the door in the face of others," said another carbon market investor, asking not be named for fear of state reprisals against his firm.]]></content:encoded>
			<category>Press Clipping</category>
			
			
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 10:20:00 +0100</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>